Articles
Copyright in AI-Generated Content: Key Legal Features
Artificial intelligence has become an everyday tool for lawyers, designers, musicians, programmers, and entrepreneurs. But a key question arises: who owns the rights to AI-generated results?
Law has no universal answer yet. Approaches differ by jurisdiction, but the main principle remains: only humans can be authors.
International approaches
- EU (incl. Moldova): protection only for human-created works. Fully machine-generated content is not protected.
- USA: Copyright Office rejects full-AI works, but protects elements with “substantial human contribution.”
- UK: since 1988, authorship can be assigned to the person making the “necessary arrangements,” but this remains debated.
- China: courts protect AI works if there is human input (editing, creative choice).
Moldova’s approach
According to Copyright and Related Rights Law:
- only natural persons can be authors;
- AI has no legal personality;
- protection applies only when there is human contribution (settings, data selection, editing).
Practical aspects
- Who is the author? If AI is a tool — rights belong to the human. If entirely AI — no protection (public domain).
- Joint authorship. Possible if multiple people contribute (prompt + editing).
- AI licenses. ChatGPT, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion often transfer rights to users but may impose restrictions.
- Risks: plagiarism in training data, difficulty proving human input.
Recommendations for authors and businesses
- keep evidence of human input (screenshots, drafts, edits);
- add original creative elements;
- review AI service terms;
- voluntary registration (AGEPI, WIPO);
- include ownership clauses in contracts.
Conclusion
AI content remains a legal “grey zone.” In Moldova and the EU, only human-created or human-enhanced works are protected.
Our team assists authors, companies, and startups to:
- register rights in AI content,
- draft contracts and licenses,
- defend interests in authorship and plagiarism disputes.
Useful articles
Legal Opinion, Memorandum and Due Diligence: what actually sits behind each format
The legal market is structured so that the same task gets different names in different offices — opinion, memorandum, assessment, analysis. Lawyers rarely explain the difference, clients rarely ask. The result is wrong expectations, weak documents and decisions made without the right information.
IFRS 18 and IFRS 19 approved in Moldova: what will change from 2027
In the Monitorul Oficial dated April 3, 2026, Order of the Ministry of Finance No. 49 of March 30, 2026 was published, approving and adopting the International Financial Reporting Standards.
Draft Law on the Crypto-Asset Market in Moldova: License, Requirements
The Republic of Moldova has developed and published for public discussion a draft Law on the Crypto-Asset Market. For the first time in the history of the Republic of Moldova, crypto businesses are receiving legal regulation and official status. This article analyzes the draft law: examining the key changes, legal risks, and practical consequences for business.
Leave a request